Psychological distress is the most common negative outcome experienced by healthcare professionals after making medication errors, according to a new study from the University of Eastern Finland. After such events, turnover intentions and absenteeism were more common among those experiencing inadequate organisational support and so called second victim distress.
During this past decade, an abundance of research has been conducted regarding the prevalence and severity of the second victim phenomenon. The term “second victim”, coined by Dr. Albert Wu from Johns Hopkins University, refers to those healthcare professionals who experience emotional distress after getting involved in or witnessing severe patient safety incidents.
In the present study, a survey was conducted among nurses and physicians working at two university hospitals in Finland between September 2022 and May 2023. The 149 respondents were mainly nurses. The findings were published in the Journal of Advanced Nursing.
The study revealed that the level of organisational support received by healthcare professionals after getting involved in a medication error affects negative work-related outcomes. An increase in turnover intentions and a tendency to take absence from work was observed when there was a perceived lack of organisational support and a higher level of second victim distress among healthcare professionals. Organisational support after medication errors was perceived as low by more than a third of the respondents, which highlights the need for cultivating a more supportive work environment for healthcare providers following medication errors.
“It is time for healthcare organisations to recognise the significance of the second victim phenomenon and act towards establishing structured support systems for second victims,” says the first author of the study, Doctoral Researcher Sanu Mahat.
The study provides valuable insight into how organisational support mediates the link between the distress experienced by healthcare providers and their intention to leave their jobs and absenteeism. However, further research is needed among different healthcare professionals in Finland.
The authors point out that understanding the impact of the second victim phenomenon can help create a blame-free and just culture that prioritises learning from errors rather than blaming those who make mistakes. This enables healthcare systems to focus not only on patient safety but also on the well-being of those who provide care.
“In an organisation where just culture prevails and a constructive response to errors is encouraged, healthcare providers become more resilient, develop positive coping abilities, and can enhance their professional competencies”, the authors conclude.
For further information, please contact:
Associate Professor Marja Härkänen, University of Eastern Finland, Department of Nursing Science, marja.harkanen@uef.fi, https://uefconnect.uef.fi/en/person/marja.harkanen/
Doctoral Researcher Sanu Mahat, University of Eastern Finland, Department of Nursing Science, sanu.mahat@uef.fi, https://uefconnect.uef.fi/en/person/sanu.mahat/
Research article:
Mahat, S., Lehmusto, H., Rafferty, A. M., Vehviläinen‐Julkunen, K., Mikkonen, S., & Härkänen, M. (2024). Impact of second victim distress on healthcare professionals' intent to leave, absenteeism and resilience: A mediation model of organizational support. Journal of Advanced Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.16291
